Pope Ex Rel. Pope v. Patterson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The sole contention of the defendant is that the plaintiff has not offered sufficient evidence of actionable negligence on the part of the defendant to carry the case to the jury.
It has been repeatedly declared by this Court that a legal duty rests upon a motorist to exercise due care to avoid injuring children whom he sees, or by the exercise of reasonable care should see, on or near the highway. Pavone v. Merion, 242 N.C. 594, 89 S.E. 2d 108; Hawkins v. Simpson, 237 N.C. 155, 74 S.E. 2d 331; Sparks v. Willis, 228 N.C. 25, 44 S.E. 2d 343; Moore v. Powell, 205 N.C. 636, 172 S.E. 327; Goss v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Greene v. Mitchell County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Sparks v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brinson Ex Rel. Brinson v. MabrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Brunson v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Winters Ex Rel. Gordon v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Hamilton v. McCashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Harris v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.