Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
At the outset it is appropriate to call attention to Rule 19 (2) of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N. C., 544, which provides that when there are two or more appeals in one action it shall not be necessary to have more than one transcript, but the statement of cases on appeal shall appear separately in the transcript. Two separate appeals were taken from the judgment on former trial, and separate records, each of approximately one hundred fifty pages, and eaeb consisting of the same pleadings, the same issues, the same judgment, and the same charge, but a different narrative…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Knoepfle v. SukoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.