Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. Williams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeicson, J.
The defendant moved for judgment as in case of non-spit' at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence. C. S., 567. The evidence on the part of plaintiff was circumstantial in its nature,.but sufficient to be submitted to the jury. The probative force was for them to determine.
“It is the settled rule of practice and the accepted position in this jurisdiction that, on a motion to nonsuit, the evidence -which makes for the plaintiff’s claim and which tends to support her cause of action, whether offered by the plaintiff or elicited from the defendant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Grant v. KnepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Kayser v. Van NestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Albritton v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Blevins v. Erwin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Cohen v. WhitemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Jones v. BagwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Butner v. . WhitlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Smith v. . WhartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.