Harris v. Wright
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The motion for judgment as of nonsuit could not have been allowed on the basis of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiffs’ intestate, since a nine-year old boy is rebuttably presumed incapable of contributory negligence. Hamilton v. McCash, 257 N.C. 611, 127 S.E. 2d 214. Therefore, we must determine if there was sufficient evidence of actionable negligence on the part of defendants to withstand the motion for involuntary nonsuit.
Plaintiffs in their complaint allege that the defendant Wright was negligent in that (1) he operated the motor vehicle in a careless and reckless manner,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Reeves v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Quadrini v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division, United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Smithers v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Hoots v. BeesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Cozart v. ChapinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.