Legal Opinion

Brunson v. Gainey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1956No. 522PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Plaintiff, by assignments of error 9, 11, 14, and 15, presents for consideration the accuracy of the charge, as related to the defense asserted by defendant, that he was confronted by a sudden emergency.

Plaintiff testified: “that the defendant passed by the deceased’s house about three or four times a day, and sometimes more than that; that the defendant passed the deceased’s house every single day; that the home of the deceased had a small front yard; that the children of the witness, including the deceased, played in the yard and in the edge of the ditch in front of the house, because the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. State v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Greene v. Mitchell County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Rodgers v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Brinson Ex Rel. Brinson v. MabrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Ennis v. DupreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Black v. Gurley Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API