Winters Ex Rel. Gordon v. Burch
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence presents the question whether the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, is sufficient to justify a verdict in their favor. Summey v. Cauthen, 283 N.C. 640, 197 S.E. 2d 549 (1973); Younts v. Insurance Co., 281 N.C. 582, 189 S.E. 2d 137 (1972); Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971). It has long been the rule in this State that the presence of children on or near a highway is a warning signal to a motorist, who must bear in mind that they have less…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Williams v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Oliver Ex Rel. Oliver v. RoyallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Daniels Ex Rel. Goodson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Anderson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.