Benavides v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Richard Benavides is an Anchorage resident who is required to spend the legislative session in Juneau as a condition of his employment. Benavides receives a salary but does not receive a per diem allowance for the time spent in Juneau. Benavides brought this class action alleging that the Alaska Legislative Council’s failure to grant such an allowance violates AS 24.10.130. The superi- or court rejected Benavides’s claims. Because we conclude that the current per diem policy complies with the statute, we affirm the judgment of the superior court.
II.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Graham-GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Rubey v. Alaska Commission on Postsecondary EducationAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Ross v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- State, Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe IAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Pfeifer v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Public AssistanceAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.