Legal Opinion

State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2011No. S-13499, S-13520PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (Alyes-ka) contracted with the Liberty Mutual Group (Liberty Mutual) to write an owner-controlled insurance program (OCIP). The State of Alaska, Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, Division of Insurance (Division), issued a cease and desist order stating that Alyeska's OCIP was prohibited by statute. An administrative law judge determined that "the Liberty Mutual program does not fit within the definition of an 'owner controlled insurance program' that the statute supplies." The Division's deputy…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kimoktoak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gottschalk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. DarrowAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State, Division of Workers' Compensation v. Titan Enterprises, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API