State, Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe I
Alaska Supreme Court
1Per curiam
I. INTRODUCTION
John Doe I and John Doe II are two separate individuals being required by the Department of Public Safety (DPS) to register as sex offenders in Alaska based on their out-of-state convictions. DPS argues that Doe I's Washington convictions and Doe II's California conviction are "similar" to the Alaska offense of attempted sexual abuse of a minor under AS 11.31.100 and AS 11.41.436(a)(2), making both Doe I and Doe II subject to Alaska's sex offender registration requirement. One superior court judge determined that Doe I is not required to register; another superior court judge…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Esquivel-Quintana v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John Doe v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- ITMO the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Kara K.Alaska Supreme Court · 2024
- John D. Rochon v. City of Nome, Allen Wright, and Jackie L.ReaderAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
- Mike Steely Morgan v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
- ROSELLI v. SMITHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.