Legal Opinion

Native Village of Elim v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1999No. S-8135PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

The Native Village of Elim appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of the Alaska Board of Fisheries and Peninsula Marketing Association. Elim argues that the Board violated its duties under the sustained yield clause of the Alaska constitution by failing to identify a specific yield of salmon to be sustained. Elim also argues that the Board has violated its duty under the state subsistence law to identify chum salmon in individual communities of Norton Sound as separate subsistence stocks and to apply the subsistence preference throughout the stocks’ migratory…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Storrs v. State Medical BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Grimm v. WagonerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API