Legal Opinion

Ross v. State, Department of Revenue

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2012No. S-14362PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Brian Ross has been absent from the State of Alaska since 1990, first as a student at the *908United States Naval Academy and later as a career Marine Corps officer. Despite his absence, Ross maintained Alaska residency and received a permanent fund dividend each year. In 1998 the Alaska Legislature amended the dividend qualifications to provide that anyone who was allowably absent for ten consecutive years would no longer be eligible for dividends. This ten-year rule, however, does not apply to members of the United States Congress, their staffs, or the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Zobel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Thomas v. ArcherAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Tesoro Corp. v. State, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
  5. In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases, In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases, In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases, In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases, In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases (Alaska Redistricting Board / Girdwood / East Anchorage)Alaska Supreme Court · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API