Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Graham-Gonzalez
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Alaska Statute 21.89.020(c) states that insurers “shall ... offer coverage” for protection against uninsured and underinsured motorists (UIM) ranging from $50,000 to $1,000,000 for injury or death of one person. The question presented in these cases is whether application forms which set out the various levels of coverage that are available but do not state the amount of the premium that must be paid violate this statute. We *281answer “no”- for reasons based on our case law, the common meaning of “offer,” indications of what the statute requires in another…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Linko v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- DeNuptiis v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.