Legal Opinion

Weston v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1983No. 8210IC1170PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

We note at the outset that the only question properly before this Court is whether the Industrial Commission had jurisdiction to consider plaintiffs claim for workers’ compensation. By order of the full Commission, the initial hearing was limited to defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Given the limited scope of the hearing, it was patently improper for the deputy commissioner to find and conclude that plaintiff had suffered an injury arising from his employment with defendant. It was similarly improper for the full Commission, on appeal from the Opinion and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Cain v. GuytonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API