Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1971No. 103PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Is plaintiff’s permanent partial disability a “change in condition” within the meaning of G.S. 97-47? If so, are defendants estopped to plead the statute in bar of plaintiff’s claim for additional compensation? Answers to these questions are determinative on this appeal.

Where a claimant suffers an injury that results in temporary total disability followed by a specific disability compensable under G.S. 97-31, compensation for the specific disability is payable in addition to that awarded for temporary total disability. Rice v. Panel Co., 199 N.C. 154, 154 S.E. 69 (1930).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Kisiah v. W.R. Kisiah Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Saums v. Raleigh Community HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Little v. Penn Ventilator Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Johnson v. Southern Tire Sales and ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API