Lucas v. Li'l General Stores
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
It is well settled that to be entitled to maintain a proceeding for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act the claimant must have been an employee of the alleged employer at the time of his injury, or, in case of a claim for death benefits, the deceased must have been such an employee when injured. Hicks v. Guilford County, 267 N.C. 364, 148 S.E. 2d 240; Askew v. Tire Co., 264 N.C. 168, 141 S.E. 2d 280; Richards v. Nationwide Homes, 263 N.C. 295, 139 S.E. 2d 645; Hayes v. Eton College, 224 N.C. 11, 29 S.E. 2d 137. Otherwise, the Act simply has no application to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Hicks v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Pearce v. American Defender Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Perkins v. Arkansas Trucking Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Goodson v. P. H. Glatfelter Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.