Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Li'l General Stores

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1976No. 14PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

It is well settled that to be entitled to maintain a proceeding for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act the claimant must have been an employee of the alleged employer at the time of his injury, or, in case of a claim for death benefits, the deceased must have been such an employee when injured. Hicks v. Guilford County, 267 N.C. 364, 148 S.E. 2d 240; Askew v. Tire Co., 264 N.C. 168, 141 S.E. 2d 280; Richards v. Nationwide Homes, 263 N.C. 295, 139 S.E. 2d 645; Hayes v. Eton College, 224 N.C. 11, 29 S.E. 2d 137. Otherwise, the Act simply has no application to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Hicks v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Pearce v. American Defender Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Perkins v. Arkansas Trucking Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Goodson v. P. H. Glatfelter Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API