Legal Opinion

Gallimore v. Marilyn's Shoes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1977No. 24PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

For an injury to be compensable under our Workmen’s Compensation Act (Chapter 97 of the General Statutes of North Carolina), the claimant must prove three elements: (1) That the injury was caused by an accident; (2) that the injury arose out of the employment; and (3) that the injury was sustained in the course of employment. G.S. 97-2(6); Bryan v. Church, 267 N.C. 111, 147 S.E. 2d 633 (1966). The findings of fact by the Industrial Commission are conclusive on appeal if supported by any competent evidence. However, the determination of whether an accident arises out of and in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Cole v. GUILFORD COUNTY AND HARTFORD ACC. & IND. CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Deese v. Champion International Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Clark v. Wal-MartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API