Legal Opinion
Sigurd City v. State
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 19, 1943No. 6303PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice.
The town of Sigurd determined to obtain a supply of water for culinary and domestic uses. About 7% miles southeast of Sigurd at the head of a canyon known as Rosses Creek Canyon there arise springs. It is the water from these springs which Sigurd decided would be the most suitable and practicable for its purposes. The waters from these springs flowed into Rosses Creek, and Rosses Creek is a natural tributary of a stream of water which runs through Kings Meadow Canyon, and is known by the name of either Kings Meadow Creek or Petersons Creek. In this canyon are located two…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
- Harris v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Snake Creek Mining & Tunnel Co. v. Midway Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Rasmussen v. Moroni Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Hildale v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Village of Lapwai v. AlligierIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Tuttle v. OldsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Delta Canal Co. v. Frank Vincent Family Ranch, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Salt Lake City v. Boundary Springs Water Users Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.