Legal Opinion

Delta Canal Co. v. Frank Vincent Family Ranch, LC

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 2013No. 20120470PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice DURHAM, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Appellants Delta Canal Company, Melville Irrigation Company, Abraham Irrigation Company, Deseret Irrigation Company, and Central Utah Water Company (collectively, Irrigation Companies) and Appellee Frank Vincent Family Ranch, LC (Vincent) are water-rights holders on the Sevier River system. The Irrigation Companies claim that Vincent's water right has been partially forfeited and partially abandoned. The district court granted summary judgment to Vincent. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The Irrigation Companies are nonprofit Utah…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Green River Canal Co. v. ThaynUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HarkerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Smith v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RasaboutUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. HaikCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. Rocky Ford v. Kents LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Southam v. South Despain Ditch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API