Legal Opinion

Harris v. Chapman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1931No. Nos. 5567 and 5649PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

—This action was brought to quiet title to the use of certain waters. The following brief history of the water rights and lands involved, as disclosed by the record, will furnish a foundation for the /disposal of the questions presented:

July 10, 1884, R. F. Buller, and Rosa B. Buller, his wife, appropriated and diverted through a ditch constructed by them, known and hereinafter referred to as the Whitton ditch, 780 miner’s inches of the waters of Big Wood River. By decree dated December 13, 1909, in the case of S. C. Frost et al. v. Alturas Water Company et al. that amount of water from Big…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Taylor v. HulettIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Arnett v. LinhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. CoburnIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. SnoderlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Application of BoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Nash v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API