Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Boundary Springs Water Users Ass'n

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1954No. 8058PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Appeal by plaintiff Salt Lake City from a judgment of the District Court affirming the State Engineer’s approval of what is therein designated an “Application for the Right of Exchange of Water” by defendant Boundary Springs Water Users Association, respondent here. This application proposes to change the place of diversion of 1.5675 cubic feet per second of the waters of Mill Creek, a stream flowing out of Mill Creek Canyon in the mountains east of Salt Lake City, from the various diversion places of several ditches below the mouth of the Canyon to the upper and lower Boundary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Utah CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Whitmore v. Murray CityUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Eardley v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Tanner v. Bacon, State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Searle v. Milburn Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wayman v. Murray City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Provo Bench Canal and Irrigation Co. v. LinkeUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1996
  5. Crafts v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API