Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Moroni Irr. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1920No. 3392PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Seventh. District, Sanpete County; D. H. Morris, Judge. Action by Amasa Rasmussen against the Moroni Irrigation Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plantiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff, hereinafter called appellant, brought this action against the defendants, hereinafter styled respondents, to quiet title to certain water hereinafter more particularly referred to and to enjoin them from interfering with his use thereof for irrigation purposes. Appellant’s claims to the water in question are fully and explicitly stated in the complaint.

After alleging that he is the owner of ten acres of land and the lessee of perhaps more than that amount in Sanpete county, describing the same, it is in substance alleged that the said lands in their natural state were arid,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Willow Creek Irrigation Co. v. MichaelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Herriman Irrigation Co. v. KeelUtah Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Snake Creek Mining & Tunnel Co. v. Midway Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Sigurd City v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API