Legal Opinion

City of Hildale v. Cooke

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2001No. 990933, 990975PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice:

[ 1 The City of Hilldale appeals from a trial court judgment awarding landowners Gherri Bateman Cooke and Barbara Andrae Hall damages pursuant to section 78-84-10 of the Utah Code for the condemnation of their property. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

1 2 Seeking to erect a 69-kilovolt electrical transmission line, the City of Hildale ("City" or "Hildale") instituted a condemnation proceeding on May 31, 1995, to obtain perpetual easements and rights-of-way on the respective properties of Cherri Cooke and Barbara Hall, defendants and appellees in the instant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BisnerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wheeler v. McPhersonUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Blackner v. State, Departmant of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API