Nerhan v. Stinson Beach County Water District
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
Appellant Keet Nerhan, doing business as KN Properties (Nerhan) appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of mandate to compel granting of a zoning variance. Respondent Stinson Beach County Water District’s demurrer was sustained without leave to amend on the grounds that the petition failed to state a claim because appellant did not own the subject property. We conclude the appeal is premature under Morehart v. County of Santa Barbara (1994) 7 Cal.4th 725 [29 Cal.Rptr.2d 804, 872 P.2d 143], and dismiss. *
Procedural History and Facts
Prior to bringing the instant petition…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Elmore v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Breslin v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cohan v. City of Thousand OaksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bettencourt v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.