Legal Opinion
Bullock v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1990No. Docket Nos. A043073, A044386, A046047PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, Acting P. J.
Beginning in 1979, defendant City and County of San Francisco (the City) adopted a number of measures intended to preserve the supply of hotel units available for residential use, by limiting conversion of such units for use by tourists. Frustrated in his efforts to remove his hotel from the reach of the San Francisco Residential Hotel Unit Conversion and Demolition Ordinance (the Conversion Ordinance), plaintiff Peter J. Bullock appeals from a judgment, a preliminary injunction, and several orders in favor of the City. We will affirm the judgment except to the…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Golden Gate Hotel Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.