Legal Opinion

Superior Court v. County of Mendocino

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1996No. S046963PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

Government Code section 681081 authorizes a county, under specified circumstances, to designate “unpaid furlough days” on which the trial courts of the county generally “shall not be in session.” In this case, we are called upon to decide whether this statute is unconstitutional on its face. The trial court rejected the facial challenge to the constitutionality of section 68108, but the Court of Appeal disagreed, concluding that the statute represents “a legislative exercise of judicial power” and violates the separation of powers doctrine embodied in article III, section 3,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API