Legal Opinion
Bettencourt v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 2007No. A112880PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, Acting P.
The trial court denied a petition for writ of mandate and for injunctive relief filed by appellant Nicholas Bettencourt and four other members of respondent San Francisco Police Department (department) who sought dismissal of disciplinary proceedings before respondent San Francisco Police Commission (commission). The officers appeal the order denying mandamus and injunctive relief, 1 contending that the charges against them must be dismissed inter alia because (1) the applicable statute of limitations bars these proceedings despite the then pending civil litigation in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fourth La Costa Condominium Owners Ass'n v. SeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jackpot Harvesting Co. v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sequoia Park Associates v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Daugherty v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Tomra Pacific, Inc. v. ChiangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.