Cohan v. City of Thousand Oaks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
Appellants spent 15 years attempting to develop a parcel of real property in the City of Thousand Oaks (City). After many denials of their applications and modification of the plans, the planning commission finally approved the proposed subdivision map and development applications with the imposition of approximately 500 conditions. The city council (Council) appealed the decision to itself and, after a public hearing, overruled the planning commission’s decision. We hold that a series of errors by the Council denied appellants both procedural and substantive due…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Las Lomas Land Company, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Los Angeles Export Terminal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Galland v. City of ClovisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.