Legal Opinion
Elmore v. Imperial Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 1984No. Civ. 28973PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff John Elmore appeals an order of the trial court sustaining without leave to amend a demurrer to his petition for writ of mandamus. Respondent Imperial Irrigation District (IID) con tends (1) the order is nonappealable; (2) the jurisdiction of the State Water Resources Control Board (Board) had already been invoked by Elmore at the time he filed the petition for writ of mandamus and therefore the Board has exclusive jurisdiction over this matter; and (3) the petition for writ of mandamus fails to state a cause of action.
Facts
On this appeal of a hearing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Collins v. CorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.