Legal Opinion

In re Banks

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1998No. Nos. 97-BG-329, 97-BG-1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that respondent, Quentin W. Banks, be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days, with the execution of the final thirty days stayed, and after sixty days of the suspension, respondent be placed on probation for a period of one year, without a fitness requirement. In addition, the Board recommends four conditions of probation, relating to respondent’s evaluation by, consent to and participation in a program conducted by the Lawyer Practice Assistance Committee (“LPAC”). The Board’s recommendation covers two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
In Re StowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
Matter of BradburyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

In Re SchoenemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
In re GeorgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
In re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
In Re WeissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
In Re WeissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003