Legal Opinion
In Re Schoeneman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 2006No. 02-BG-1186PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Charles W. Schoéneman, a member of the Bar of this court, be suspended from practice for four months. The facts upon which this recommendation is based are set forth in its Report and Recommendation, relevant parts of which are attached hereto as an Appendix and made a part hereof. Briefly, Schoeneman neglected the cases of three clients before the United States District Court, misled them and lied to them as to the status of their cases, concealed from them his suspension from practice and, we hold, engaged in the unauthorized…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re Laurence F. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re NwadikeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re LebowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re Sharon Styles AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.