Legal Opinion

In re Mance

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 2012No. 11-BG-1357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary matter, the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee (“Committee”) recom*1126mends approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. See D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 12.1. Respondent, Robert Manee, admits to violating the following District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 1.1(a) (failure to provide competent representation), Rule 1.1(b) (failure to serve a client with skill and care), Rule 1.3(a) (failure to provide zealous and diligent representation), Rule 1.5(b) (failure to provide client with a writing stating the rate or basis of fee), Rule 1.7(b) (representing client at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In re BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re ManceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. In re: Robert W. Mance, IIIDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API