Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bloom
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
This attorney disciplinary proceeding principally concerns misuse of client funds.
Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, petitioned this Court for disciplinary action against Sidney L. Bloom (Bloom), a member of the Maryland Bar since December 11, 1970. We referred the matter to Judge William Cave of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to whose findings Bloom has not excepted. Three different transactions are involved.
In 1977 Bloom, on behalf of a client, had started a mortgage foreclosure which the parties settled. Under their agreement Bloom, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VelasquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McBurneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- In Re the Reinstatement of MurrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.