Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Boehm

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 28, 1982No. [Misc. (BV) No. 24, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

Once again we shall try to make indelibly clear that, ordinarily, the sanction for misappropriation of a client’s funds by an attorney is disbarment.

Pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV 9, Bar Counsel filed a petition with us on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission seeking disciplinary action against Kenneth Lee Boehm, a member of the Bar of this Court since 1970. The misconduct complained of took place while Boehm was acting as attorney for the estate of William Trent Johns during the years 1972 through 1976.

In its petition, Bar Counsel alleged violations of Disciplinary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BurkaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API