Attorney Grievance Commission v. Milliken
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
Acting through Bar Counsel, the Attorney Grievance Commission filed two petitions for disciplinary action against Herschel D. Milliken for violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. On February 14, 1996, this Court consolidated the two petitions. We referred the matter, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9 (b) 1 to Judge Carol E. Smith of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. Following an evidentiary hearing and oral argument involving ten separate complaints, Judge Smith found evidence sufficient to sustain nine of the ten…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. UgwuonyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.