Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Santos

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 19, 2002No. Misc. AG No. 31 Sept. Term 2001PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

In this disciplinary action, prompted by complaints of clients for whom Mario C. Santos, the respondent, undertook representation, and a referral from a Bankruptcy Judge, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, acting through Bar Counsel, in turn acting at the direction of the Review Board, see Maryland Rule 16-709, 1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary Action against the respondent, charging the respondent with multiple violations of various of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by Maryland Rule 16-812. Based on the complaint of the clients and of Bar…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Attorney Griev. Comm'n of Maryland v. Franz & LipowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. UgwuonyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API