Attorney Grievance Commission v. Velasquez
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
This tragedy is rooted in the abuse of alcohol but not abuse by the respondent. It involves misguided efforts to keep a law practice and a lawyer’s personal affairs afloat financially. Unfortunately, the means used violated a Maryland statute and certain of the Disciplinary Rules.
Acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9 on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, Bar Counsel filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against Ray Velasquez, a member of the Bar of this Court since June 7, 1963. The petition asserted that Velasquez violated Disciplinary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Balliet v. BALTO. CTY. BAR ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.