Legal Opinion
In Re the Reinstatement of Murray
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 7, 1989No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 14, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
On 22 April 1977, Richard C. Murray was disbarred by consent. Md. Rule BV12 d. He now seeks reinstatement to the Bar. Md. Rule BV14. Pursuant to Rule BV14 d 2, Bar Counsel conducted an investigation. Thereafter, Murray’s petition was “heard and determined by the Inquiry Panel” and “reviewed by the Review Board____” Id. Both of those bodies unanimously recommended reinstatement.
We first enunciated criteria for reinstatement after disbarment in In re Meyerson, 190 Md. 671, 59 A.2d 489 (1948), reaffirmed them in Maryland St. Bar Ass’n v. Boone, 255 Md. 420, 258 A.2d 438 (1969),…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- In Re MeyersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- In Re the Petition for Reinstatement to Practice Law of BravermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- In Re BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Petition of PierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Kennedy v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. HoppCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.