Legal Opinion

T. M. Dover Mercantile Co v. Gates

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1929No. 18953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

Appellant, T. M. Dover Mercantile Company, as plaintiff, sued ap-pellee, J. W. Gates, defendant below, to recover on a promissory note.

By appropriate pleadings plaintiff alleged execution, delivery, maturity, and nonpayment of the note, reciting that the consideration therefor was that plaintiff had' paid certain assessments levied against defendant as a stockholder in a certain banking institution for the purpose of its continuation in business, which act of plaintiff was by defendant ratified in the giving of the note sued on.

Defendant, admitting execution and delivery of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stevens v. ReillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Anderson v. WhitenerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Farmers' State Bank of Belpre v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Florence v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Beam v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dusbabek v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Thomos v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Mid-West Chevrolet Corp. v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Guaranty State Bank of Texola v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Dusbabek v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API