Legal Opinion

Beam v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1924No. 14897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, 0.

The plaintiff, defendant in error, brought the action against the defendant, plaintiff in error, to recover on a promissory note. The note was made and executed on February 28, 1920, for the sum of $400, payable May 28, 1920, with 10 per cent, interest per annum from maturity, by S. H. Richard and Sarah Richard, as principals, and J. P. Beam, the defendant, as surety." The note was not paid at maturity, and on May 23, 1921, Richard and his wife, being indebted to the bank on another note in the sum of $185, executed a new note for $585, merging the the indebtedness of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Menten v. ShutteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  3. Lookabaugh v. EppersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Myers v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. O'Neil v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Wilhite v. BrinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Schwarze v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Pemberton v. LongmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. T. M. Dover Mercantile Co v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API