Legal Opinion
Florence v. Russell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 30, 1924No. 13977PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHACKELFORD, C.
The plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs below, and the defendants in. error were the defendants. The parties will be designated herein as plaintiffs and defendants as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiffs filed their suit against defendants on the 8th of January, 1921. By their petition they seek to recover the sum of $2,500 with interest at 6 per cent, from May 2, 1918, the principal sum being the amount paid by plaintiffs for their interests in the Valley Mining .Company. It is charged in the peition that the defendants—
“Unlawfully, wilfully, falsely…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bentley v. Zelma Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Lee v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ettlinger v. CollinsArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by11 opinions
- American National Bank of Enid v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Swift v. McMurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Colby v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. BoggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Madden v. TillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.