Legal Opinion

Dusbabek v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1934No. 20302PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in replevin for the purpose of foreclosing certain mortgages, securing certain notes, given by the defendant, Frank Bowers, to the J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company, on a threshing machine separator, etc., and a second-hand engine.

The parties will be referred to as they appear in the trial of said cause; George F. Dusbabek, plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, and Frank Bowers, defendant in error, as defendant.

Plaintiff alleged two causes of action. The first cause of action involves a threshing machine, separator, and other equipment need in connection therewith, while the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cottrill v. KrumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Snell v. Union Sawmill Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Springer v. . BienNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Oklahoma City v. McMasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Sides v. John Cordes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Rogers v. MeiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. SUTTON v. DAVID STANLEY CHEVROLETSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API