Legal Opinion
Mid-West Chevrolet Corp. v. Noah
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 11, 1935No. 23772PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties will be referred to 'as they appeared in the lower court; the plaintiffs in error were defendants, and the defendant in error was plaintiff.
The defendant Mid-West Chevrolet Corporation was engaged in selling Chevrolet automobiles and trucks in the city of Tulsa. The defendant Crasse was truck sales manager for said company, and one Hal Hays was general sales manager and vice president of the corporation. Shortly prior to June. 1931, the defendants ran the following advertisement in the Tulsa newspapers:
“Employment
“Help Wanted, Male
“Wanted Men
“Who can finance new trucks
“Good Haul;…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Donaldson, Assignee v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- McLean v. Southwestern Casualty Ins. Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Blackburn v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Warren v. PulleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Henry v. HopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Starmer v. Mid-West Chevrolet Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Adalex Laboratories, Inc. v. KrawitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Mechanical Constructors, Inc. v. B-W Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.