Legal Opinion
Johnnycake Mountain Associates v. Ochs
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 9, 2007No. AC 27440PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BERDON, J.
The defendants, Lana M. Ochs and Joseph J. Ochs, brought this appeal from the trial court’s judgment of foreclosure on real property located at 206 Johnnycake Mountain Road in Burlington. The defendants claim that the court (1) improperly concluded that the substitute plaintiff, Linda M. Michalek, 1 did not negligently misrepresent that the property could be used for commercial purposes without additional permits, (2) improperly applied the law of equitable estoppel, (3) abused its discretion by failing to order the remedy of rescission and (4) abused its discretion in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Richard v. A. Waldman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Nazami v. Patrons Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of North Oaks v. SarpalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- TD Bank, N.A. v. M.J. Holdings, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Western Dermatology Consultants, P.C. v. VitalWorks, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Blackwell v. MahmoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.