Legal Opinion
Blackwell v. Mahmood
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 27, 2010No. AC 30831PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendants Tullat Mahmood and Two Hundred Eighty Broad Elm, LLC, 1 appeal from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Marcus Blackwell, for breach of contract, statutory theft, conversion, bad faith and violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) found that they were estopped from enforcing a mortgage contingency clause and that the plaintiff was entitled to the return of his deposit, (2) awarded treble damages for statutory theft pursuant to General…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Lawson v. Whitey's Frame ShopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Cohen v. ROLL-A-COVER, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. GanimConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Rana v. TerdjanianConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Coss v. StewardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.