Legal Opinion
Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 11, 1995No. 14937PublishedCited by 212 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly admitted evidence of unrelated conduct between the defendant and automobile dealerships who were not parties to the litigation. The plaintiffs comprise three groups of automobile dealerships: the Newman group;1 the Hoffman group;2 and the Morande group3 (dealerships). The dealerships sued the defendant, The Hartford Courant Company4 (Courant), alleging intentional misrepresentation or fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA),5 General Statutes § 42-110a et…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.