Legal Opinion

Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. Partnership

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 7, 2009No. AC 29012PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

The plaintiff, Centimark Corporation (Centimark), commenced this action against the defendant, Village Manor Associates, Limited Partnership (Village Manor), seeking, inter alia, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien that it had placed on Village Manor’s real property after Village Manor had failed to pay Centi-mark for services rendered in installing a roof. Village Manor, alleging problems with the roof, filed a counterclaim against Centimark. Centimark, as a counterclaim defendant, impleaded M. Dzen Roofing Company, Inc. (Dzen), the roofing company that installed a portion of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Whitman Hotel Corporation v. Elliott & Watrous Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Nazami v. Patrons Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Perez v. D AND L TRACTOR TRAILER SCHOOLConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Sovereign Bank v. LicataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Taylor v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. ARGENTINIS v. FortunaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API