Legal Opinion
Nazami v. Patrons Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 5, 2006No. 17537, 17539PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZAR,ELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Shahnaz Nazami, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the named defendant, Patrons Mutual Insurance Company (Patrons) and its agent, the defendant Fallon Insurance Agency, Inc. (Fallon). The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly struck the second and fifth counts of her complaint because she sufficiently had alleged: (1) a cause of action against Fallon under the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (CUIPA), General Statutes § 38a-815 et seq., and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Karas v. Liberty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.