Legal Opinion
Polverari v. Peatt
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 15, 1992No. 10626PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendants in this commercial real estate dispute appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding the plaintiffs damages for unjust enrich*193ment.1 They claim that the trial court (1) improperly awarded damages for unjust enrichment even though it found that an express contract that had not been breached existed among the parties, (2) incorrectly determined that the plaintiffs had satisfied their burden of proof regarding unjust enrichment, (3) incorrectly found that the clean hands doctrine did not preclude the plaintiffs from obtaining equitable relief, (4) incorrectly calculated the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Clay v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1999
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.