Legal Opinion
Burns v. Koellmer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 30, 1987No. 4732PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This appeal is brought by the named defendant1 from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, after a jury trial. The defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict, in charging the jury on theories of implied contract, unjust enrichment and quantum meruit, and in failing to submit interrogatories to the jury. We find no error.
The relevant facts which could reasonably have been found by the jury are as follows. The defendant oper*377ated a tennis club. The plaintiff, who played tennis at the club, began a social relationship with him. At times, she…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Providence Electric Co. v. Sutton Place, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Polverari v. PeattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Lo Sacco v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.