Stockton Morris Plan Co. v. California Tractor & Equipment Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff arising out of the assignment of a conditional sales contract by defendant to plaintiff. By its complaint plaintiff and respondent (referred to hereinafter as the finance company) alleged as follows: That on March 31, 1947, defendant and appellant (hereinafter referred to as the tractor company) transferred to the finance company a document, a copy of which is attached to the complaint; that this document was purportedly executed by the tractor company, as seller, and “Mariposa County District No. 5,” as buyer, for the sum of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Morey v. PaladiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- South Tahoe Gas Co. v. Hofmann Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.