Legal Opinion

Stockton Morris Plan Co. v. California Tractor & Equipment Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1952No. Civ. 8037PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff arising out of the assignment of a conditional sales contract by defendant to plaintiff. By its complaint plaintiff and respondent (referred to hereinafter as the finance company) alleged as follows: That on March 31, 1947, defendant and appellant (hereinafter referred to as the tractor company) transferred to the finance company a document, a copy of which is attached to the complaint; that this document was purportedly executed by the tractor company, as seller, and “Mariposa County District No. 5,” as buyer, for the sum of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Morey v. PaladiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. South Tahoe Gas Co. v. Hofmann Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API